DXO PHOTOLAB 4 SOFTWARE
For better/smoother operation, like most software and PC games, you need higher clocks (partly why Intel still seems to produce a tiny bit better performance compared to AMD, Intel has higher Instructions Per Clock and higher frequency in the range of 4.8 to 5.1 GHz on the highest models). Most of the other aspects of DXO seems to be CPU dependent and it doesn't handle more the 6 cores all that well, meaning not much benefit from 8, 12 or 16 Cores. The new PC did not max out the CPU and the GPU was at maybe 20%.Ĭlick to expand.From a bit of searching it seems that Deep Prime functions best on GPU Hardware Acceleration, the faster the GPU (the more Cuda or Stream Cores, depending on if its nVidia or AMD) the faster the Deep Prime results are. The old one maxed out the CPU at about 100% nearly all the time, the GPU was at 1-2%. And for this test I used a HDD not a SDD on the old PC, so that might explain the difference.) (Previous test for 4 similar pictures took 7 minutes. This comparison is not entirely fair as my new PC was not running anything but DxO PL4 and my old one was playing music and had a web browser and a chat going. On my old PC it took 10 minutes 30 seconds! On my new PC the 4 pictures took about 30 seconds to finish! I took 4 pictures in Raw 20 and used the default settings in DxO PL4 (1- DxO Standard) and added DeepPRIME, exported as JPEG at 100% quality. My old one is about 7 years old and has a AMD FX8350 CPU, the GPU is to old and slow for GPU acceleration so only the CPU is used. You can see what I have in my new PC earlier in this thread. Just a report on DeepPRIME using my newly built PC and comparing to my old PC. 100% zoomed in on Lightroom and then screenshot.
DXO PHOTOLAB 4 ISO
The image was taken with an E-M1 Mark ii and Olympus 12-40 F2.8 at 19mm, 1/15 second and ISO 3200. On the top image there is no colour in the label at all, in the second image there is. Take a look at the green bottle on the shelf, specifically the label. Secondly some of the colours are way better in the DEEPprime image. I believe this to be a benefit of the DxO lens profiles. Interestingly both files are 5234 pixels wide. Neither file has been cropped at all but you can see in the second screenshot that there is more real estate to the RHS of the photos on the wall (the white border is just my Lightroom UI). The other benefits I see in this file are firstly I seem to have acquired a few more pixels. The second was DEEPprime only and then apply the same processing settings except noise reduction and sharpening back in Lightroom. The top one was what I was able to do in Lightroom. Below are two screenshots of the same file at 100%. As well as the overall noise reduction I've also noticed other benefits. I was also impressed by the results of my own testing and purchased DxO Photolab 4 Elite during their black Friday sale.
I've been really impressed by DEEPprime and the noise reduction results people have posted here.
0 kommentar(er)
